The role of 'anaucitya' in the comprehension of a proverb

Authors

  • Dhanashree Lele Ph.D. student at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciecnes, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400076
  • Malhar Kulkarni Professor, (Sumati and Atmaram Kotwal Sanskrit Acharya Chair Professor) at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400076

Keywords:

Proverb, Poetry, Aucitya, Anaucitya, Ksemendra, Proverb Comprehension

Abstract

There are many theories in Indian poetics which discuss different characteristics of poetry. However, each theory focuses on a specific characteristic of poetry except the aucitya theory put forward by the alan͘kārika Kṣemendra. Poetry is considered to be flawless, beautiful, impactful and gets appreciated by the Sahṛdayas i.e., connoisseurs only if it has propriety. What type of propriety does Poetry need? And how can one find it out? These questions are answered by the theory of aucitya. Kṣemendra has thought of twenty-seven types of aucitya which can be examined in poetry. Kṣemendra, by putting forward this theory, as if has given us a tool to investigate the propriety of different components in poetry. While putting forward the theory Kṣemendra has discussed and given examples of not only of aucitya but also of anaucitya.

Since it is observed that there are many commonalities shared by proverbs and poetry, this paper attempts to apply the theory from the domain of Indian Poetics i.e., aucitya theory to proverb comprehension. Kṣemendra, while putting forward this theory shows how anaucitya proves to be a flaw/hurdle in enjoying poetry. This paper, on the contrary, attempts to elaborate on how anaucitya in proverb helps in the comprehension of proverbs. This paper also explains the process of the comprehension of the proverbs with the help of an unpublished Sanskrit text.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Jha Acharya Vrajmohan (1982), Aucityavichārcharchā, Chaukhamba surbharti prakashan, Varanasi

Kulkarni Malhar, “Introducing fresh terminology to cognitively explain sentence meaning in the Paninian grammatical tradition”, Studi Classici e Orientali, Vol. 67.1, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2021. Pp. 487-495 , DOI 10.12871/978883339503623

Kulkarni Malhar, िवससादः visaprasādaḥ, an unpublished Sanskrit work on Multi- Word- Expressions

K. Kunjini Raja,( 1977), Indian theories of meaning, the Adyar library and research centre.

Pataskar Bhagyalata ( Vārttika-s, Vaidika Samshodhana Mandala, Vaidika Samshodhana Mandala, (Adarsha Sanskrit Shodha Sanstha), Pune

Tripathi, R. (1963). Dhvanyaloka of Sri mad Anandavardhana Acharya with the Lochana commentary of Abhinava Gupta (along with its Hindi Translation) and an extensive Hindi commentary (named Taravati). Moti Lal Banarasi Das.

V. Raghavan (1970), An introduction to Indian Poetics, Macmillan and Company Limited, Kolkata

https://uou.ac.in/sites/default/files/slm/MASL-603.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-08-22

How to Cite

Lele, D., & Kulkarni, M. (2024). The role of ’anaucitya’ in the comprehension of a proverb. Shodhasamhita, 10(2), 53–64. Retrieved from https://kksushodhasamhita.org/index.php/sdsa/article/view/1346

Issue

Section

English Articles